Muslim Hypocracy
submitted 6 months 3 days 20 hours ago by: pirzada : 7 commentsI have always been against uniting muslims as single nation theory, against the current back-drop of all socio-politik. Its not feasible.
But coming to the topic, I fail to see use of logic, education and objective analysis coming from the so-called Muslim Leaders (and by that, keeping the views simple, I mean religious self-proclaimed leaders).
Latest series of cartoon publishing is NOT blasphemous: how many of us actually KNOW these were the pictures of Muhammed (PBUH)??
Did the europeans actually defaced him or show him in some kind of objectionable posture?!??
Instead of going straight to their courts, claiming that newspaper are publishing false and fabricated information and they be stopped or injected, we all resorted to boycott Worst yet, we continue to use european products and feel proud about it.
Lets go back a decade. We have war in balkans and Bosnia is burning. Muslims are masacared and women raped. As I was analysing events very closely and close by, I remembered the only help that ever arrived was petro-dollars of Saudia and some family adoptions from Pakistan (during the first tenure of Nawaz Sharif). NONE, and I repeat NONE, mulim religious leader even spoke of supporting through masses. None of todays' new-breed of Osama-inspired generation of self-declared religo's even talk about it. They have not even written a book of the miseries, no fact-finding mission by them to reveal the untold european politics, none printed a report on how many women were made of extreme conditions (losing their sons/husbands/brothers, got raped, or burned alive). NONE.
This is plain HYPOCRACY. Religios (a term i use for religio-politik party leaders, as well those who have intensions to "install" islam as a system in Pakistan or muslim world) continue to tell us that in the golden ages of islam we were leaders because we are GOD's chosen. Hahaha, what a jewish mentality. BTW, they are GOD's chosen also. Muslims were leaders because of education/research and promotion of analytical thoughts - NOT because they were chosen.
Unless there is change within us - we become from talk-prone to action-prone, we will remain in the slug we are in. And I don't see that happening, if ever a current wave of religios come to power.
By the way, not too long ago, Aamir Cheema was murdered in German jail. How many times have we went against Germans???
Comments
you r right but hypocrisy is a trademark of our political leaders not the general public
more than 55% of our ppl r ignorant, all they r concerned with is their livelihood, they don't care much abt what happens in the world
and the educated ones r so busy in paying lease on their cars and on maintaining their social status that they are indifferent to the world even the Islamic World
i don't blame them, impotency of OIC is enough to disillusion anyone
its not about being educated ones paying their leases. Its about being hypocrat: claiming to represent something and then doing against its fundamentals. Worst yet, forcing others to follow suit or declaring them miscreants.
One way or other, religion should NOT be part of politics. Its about how I choose to observe.
Unfortunately, religion has always been used as pretext to wars.
i meant to say they have become self-centered n do not care abt Danish paperz, Gitmo stuff n so on....they even don't talk much abt these things let alone practical actions
There is nothing in Danish papers that is offensive. I don't know why there is so much fuss about it.
oh really,sorry then...i thought if all the leading newspaper of Pakistan carried that news so there might b sth to it...but u seem to b so certain then it means as usual i would b wrong
All you need to ask them to produce proof that it is Mohammed (PBUH). If they can't, sue them for damages in Pakistan, and else where. You will see German, Dutch, Norwegian and other countries leading newspapers re-tracting.
If they prove it is actually Mohammed (PBUH), then you have to see analytically in what way is he degorated. Just because they published a picture is NOT blasphemous.
BTW, the way muslims are labelling every other thing blasphamy I wonder if their leaders are off-springs of jewish rabbi...they were infamous for declaring eveything blasphamy if they did not liked it, rather than what actually was/was not.
Hmmmmm ... something to think about :)